This is the second in a sequence of posts based upon Chris James' blog post The Goal of Ecumenism: Why and how to be one . The first of these posts is Why Are We Divided?
Section III of the post, 'Ecumenism and the Visibility of the Church', explores the "the most hotly debated ecumenical question": should the church be one visible community or is its unity somehow invisible? I summarise it below but it is better to read the section in James' post in full.
- James explores the thinking of Stanley Grentz, a free church theologian who argues denominationalism emphasises the invisibility of the church and that visibility is inevitably sectarian as it must point to a particular visible church.
- James then turns to a Catholic view of visible unity. This view recognises the baptism of other traditions but seeks a reunion within the Catholic Church and so in a way is similar to Grentz's position in its desire not to call its own ecclesiology into question.
- Then James turns to the ecumenism of the World Council of Churches. The WCC seeks a united church in a single communion. It is this view that has given rise to the contrasting positions of full visible unity and reconciled diversity. The latter is understood as the openness churches have to each other. Newbigin is quoted as an advocate of the former although he seems to take a midway position, seeking for example interchangeability of ministers, which is somehow short of full institutional union. His criticism of reconciled diversity is that it make intellectual agreement the basis of unity, which is a mistake because it overemphasises the importance of doctrinal agreement.
Continue reading "The Goal of Ecumenism 2: The Visibility of the Church" »
Recent Comments