I do not usually participate in conversations between theologians and scientists. My purpose in touching upon this subject is to map out some of the possibilities for ecumenical conversations.
I am also aware I am assuming an elementary understanding of the issues involved. The reason is that when I read discussions on websites between Christians and scientists it seems there is a degree of mutual incomprehension.
I want to be sure that anyone following the thread of my arguments is sure of where I stand on these elementary issues before I move onto more complex concerns.
Whilst I am sure God does not trump theory, I believe it is important theologians enter into conversation with scientists. There will be times when some theologians disagree with some scientists. When this happens it is essential they tackle science on its own ground.
Ideally these conversations should include several theologians from multiple traditions. Theological reflection from a variety of traditions is likely to act as a mutual corrective.
We should always be wary of claims of objectivity, wherever they come from. This is why the peer review system is important amongst scientists. A piece of work that has been replicated or verified by colleagues or competitors is likely to be more reliable than the work of a lone scientist.
It is not difficult for scientists to overlook how their prior assumptions can determine the ways in which they interpret their data. Sometimes a view from another discipline can help identify unintentional biase.
The best attitude though is not one of setting out to correct scientific biase. It is to bring scientists and theologians into a joint exploration and interpretation of the universe. Usually the uncovering of hidden biase is difficult and more likely to happen in a voyage of mutual discovery. Generative conversations are likely to uncover new ground unsuspected by all concerned.
Comments